BS ISO IEC 30124-2015 pdf free download – Code of practice for the implementation of a biometric system.
These factors are included because they are either specific to a biometric system or important in addressingthe ethical concerns raised when introducing such a system.Note that some factors, such as cost and projectrisk, are not discussed in detail in this code of practice as they are general considerations that could equallyapply to the implementation of any technology.
Whilst these factors are listed separately for convenience, they are interdependent and, as such, cannot beconsidered in isolation. Therefore,planning for the implementation of a biometric system is a process ofselection and trade-off, with trade-off decisions being made on the basis of finding the right balance betweenall these factors through an iterative process.
ln addition, proper consideration of all these factors, without prior engagement with stakeholders could resultin the selection of a biometric system that fails to deliver the results for which it is intended.Therefore,stakeholder engagement is highlighted here as an important factor to be considered at an early stage inplanning for implementation. Stakeholders, including potential biometric data subjects, should be engaged atan early stage when preparing for the use of a biometric system in order to communicate the reasons for itsuse and to identify and address any concerns, particularly in relation to privacy and data protection.
The success of a biometric system is critically dependant upon the extent to which users want it to succeed,and in this regard is probably more vulnerable to adverse perceptions than most types of technology.”Users”in this context includes not only the subjects whose biometric characteristics will be used, but also attendants,administrators, supervisors and those who have to maintain the biometric system.
A shared understanding of the business problem and the anticipated benefits is clearly a significant element inthis engagement, as is a shared appreciation of the risks, both real and imagined. Ilndividual judgements onacceptability are also influenced by their views on the value these benefits can give them as individuals.
A biometric reference cannot be verified in the same way as text data. This is a subject to be addressed earlyin an engagement and is a significant activity, as is a shared appreciation of the risks, both real and imagined.For cooperative subjects in a biometric verification system， it may improve their level of comfort with thesystem if it can be clearly demonstrated during registration that the biometric reference is linked to the correctbiographic data and/or privileges
7.2Biometric modality
There are a number of biometric modalities that could be considered.For example, for access control, thesecould include:
hand geometry;
.fingerprint;
.finger vein;
.palm vein;
All of these modalities are available commercially and have been deployed as part of a variety of access orworkflow applications.
All biometric modalities have particular considerations that could have a bearing upon selection and choosingthe right biometric modality for the application entails optimizing trade-offs between numerous conflictingfactors such as convenience to users, security requirements, acceptance by users and costs.
One consideration, for example, is whether the preference is for a biometric modality that requires contact ornon-contact technology.
Another consideration might be whether the preference is for a biometric modality that requires behaviouralcharacteristics or biological characteristics. Dynamic signature and voice recognition modalities areconsidered as behavioural characteristics, whereas fingerprint, facial image, iris image,hand geometry, fingervein and palm vein modalities are considered as biological characteristics.
An assessment of the range of biometric modalities available should be conducted in order to determinewhich modality to use for the intended application.The assessment should identify:
.suitability to the target subject population (e.g. whether there are any constraints);
. the level of subject interaction with the biometric system (e.g. whether contact with the data capture device is required);
.the suitability of the environment in which data capture device will be located;BS ISO IEC 30124 pdf download.